Mirena vs. Paraguard vs. Nuvaring
Jan. 22nd, 2007 09:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have an appointment soon for insertion of Mirena, a hormonal IUD. Does anyone out there have experience with Mirena and/or Paragard (the copper one)? I know it's a good option, and cheaper than the ring over 2 years, but the whole "perforated uterus" thing and the whole "occasional spotting and really bad cramping for the first three months" thing scares me.
Nuvaring worked without a hitch for me - I would be opting for the IUD for the long-term cost savings and the decreased hassle, as well as the lower hormonal load.
Nuvaring worked without a hitch for me - I would be opting for the IUD for the long-term cost savings and the decreased hassle, as well as the lower hormonal load.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 06:05 am (UTC)Love, love, love it and have had it 5 years this month.
It sucked getting in. Hurt like mad. Take ibuprofen or something that prevents cramping. Take pain meds or have them with you. Have your man rub your feet and be good to you.
In my experience, the pain subsided the first night, the second day was crampy, but the foot rubbing from the ex-bf helped, and then now five years later it rocks to have an IUD. My periods are about a day or day and a half of spotting - nothing like a period and a side effect of the light dose of hormones. Cramps are almost nonexistent. I hear those are worse with the copper-T. And, I don't have to think about birth control and haven't for five years.
But I do recall the first few months had irregular spotting and occasional cramps. It wasn't so bad, and utterly manageable. I think the perforation risk is negligable - they say that because it's a risk in like one in a million. You're young - your uterus isn't stretched out from 10 pregnancies, which I'm led to belive has a lot to do with perforations (which I've only seen once in a woman who had been pregnant 13 times, at an abortion clinic I worked at over the span of a year. And they were doing an abortion not inserting an IUD - an IUD is not going to perf your uterus). Most of the women who work at said clinic, including the doctors, have the Mirena. And of all the women in my grad school program, the women who had the Mirena all had worked in women's health care. I guess we knew all our options and figured out that it was the best for us. And all of them really liked it too.
Anyway, ask a question, get answers.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 06:16 am (UTC)Had you been previously pregnant when you got your IUD? The doctor at planned parenthood, where I had mine inserted, nearly refused to insert mine when she read in my chart that I had never been pregnant. This was also the excuse [for dr's not giving me an IUD] I had heard during the previous 10 years I was trying to get an IUD and couldn't get anyone to even consider giving me one.
My insertion was perfectly simple. One try and it went in. The worst part was the clamp on my uterus. Until I got home... then it was hell for about 12 hours.
Also, let me confirm that cramps on paraguard can ****ing suck. But they are usually pretty manageable now.
I used to defend an abortion clinic. Thank you for working in one!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:52 pm (UTC)The pros for the Mirena include sponaneity, lower hormones, and in the long run lower cost (though there's a decent chance I would be removing the IUD right around the price break-even point, as we're potentially looking to get pregnant somewhere in that time range).
My argument for NOT getting the ring again was the lower hormone dosage. However, 2 more years of the ring wouldn't be a big difference, eh? And then the Mirena after kids?
It's just such a tough decision, and the occasional bleeding/cramping horror stories have me scared!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:32 pm (UTC)I've been perfectly happy with the ring for years, but wanted to switch to an iud before we moved with our plans for lots of travel (one less thing to worry about is my reasoning). I plan on looking into it here.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:46 pm (UTC)Mirena: $440 for the IUD, $175 for the insertion = $615. Good for 5 years, probably looking at getting pregnant before the full 5 year mark (!).
Nuvaring: $20 per month with prescription coverage = $240/year. The break-even point would thus be just about 2 1/2 years.
Nuvaring has a considerably higher dose of hormones, from what I can tell. Nuvaring releases 0.015 mg/day of ethinyl estradiol (EE) AND 0.120 mg/day of etonogestrel. Mirena releases 15ug=.015mg/day of levonorgestrel only. I don't know how these hormones compare, but I can only assume they are in a similar family and thus have similar effects (anyone with more knowledge, please jump in!). It would seem the dosage on levonorgestrel and EE are the same from Mirena to Nuvaring, but the Nuvaring adds the 120ug of etonogestrel.
I found a really rad ob/gyn doctor at the Allegheny General Hospital LifeStages program - Dr. Cathy Saunders. From what I can tell, LifeStages caters to young mothers and don't-wanna-be-mothers, particularly lower income. Dr. Saunders is 100% willing to insert an IUD despite my lack of prior pregnancy and my interest in future pregnancy. She's been very helpful (or rather, her assistant has!).
-Morley (not logged in - at work)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 05:32 pm (UTC)